greatnoob.blogg.se

It's not that e-readers are bad for you-nuggets read via paperback just stay in your mind longer.īecause of this, it's important to take a break from the screen. Admittedly, I've found myself swiping back several pages to reread passages.

This could come in handy if you're perusing emails, however, too much e-reader time can slightly affect whether or not you'll remember those crucial plot details. When it comes to reading digitally, the opposite occurs since you do so at a faster speed, which Wolf says provokes multitasking and skimming. Basically, these factors allow you to absorb details, a useful benefit for academics. But unlike a proper bookworm, I'll go ahead and ruin the ending for you: There's no real winner here.Į-readers change the way you retain information.Īccording to Maryanne Wolf, director of UCLA's Center for Dyslexia, Diverse Learners,and Social Justice-and the author of Reader, Come Home: The Reading Brain in the Digital World-text in print slows your mind down, allowing time for critical thinking processes that cultivate empathy and perspective.

This alarmed me.Īs someone who used to willingly spend hours flipping through pages at a book store, I wondered, Have I betrayed bibliophiles everywhere? Should I sacrifice it all and chuck my Kindle? To answer these burning questions, I consulted some experts to assess the factors that contribute to the ultimate showdown: E-readers vs. Even though I've read 66 novels in the past two years (the average American reads 12 books in one), only four were print. Yet as I was looking at my bookcase recently, I noticed it hasn't changed much since my high school days. I'm mesmerized by the 7.5-by-4.7 inch screen, and let me tell you: the world of 99 cent smutty e-books is a dark, dangerous, and addicting place. It has a special place in my bed, tucked under my pillow every night. My Kindle Fire comes with me on road trips, to the bathroom, to lunch, and on rare excursions to the gym. Plus, it's bigger than my smart phone, on which I'd have to squint to view the tiny text.

On command, it allows me to navigate a curated list of thousands of authors and genres, making the journey feel endless. Regular books were always there for me, but once I finished one title, who knew when I'd get to start the next? My Kindle, however, makes the process of hunting for a book thrilling. I've read 66 novels in the past two years.Īnd then, for Christmas 2016, my aunt bought me my first Kindle, the best gift I've ever received. She loved it, and enjoyed having thousands of stories at her fingertips. Meanwhile, I noticed that my aunt, a fellow book lover, had fallen victim to a Kindle. The fact that I could easily access my favorite fictional hero with the touch of a button suddenly made digital reading not so bad. In high school, I discovered that Harry Potter fan-fiction was a thing, and quickly began absorbing it on my Android. Now that I'm older, I'm in that minority. Contrastingly, 29 percent of readers use both formats, and only 7 percent exclusively consume books digitally. In fact, 67 percent of Americans have read a paperback in the past year, and 39 percent of people only opt for print. According to the Pew Research Center, old fashioned print books are still more popular than e-readers. Hours-long visits to Barnes and Noble were pure bliss. I loved the smell and the feel of crisply-bound pages. As a teen, I snuck around a borrowed copy of 50 Shades of Grey-one that's still hiding underneath my childhood mattress.īooks became a comforting constant in my life. My trips to the library were regular (yes, I still owe a substantial late fee), and I'd often get in trouble for keeping my bedroom light on until 4 a.m., completely lost in the pages of a YA novel. When I was a toddler, I loved sitting in my mom's lap as she read me copies of Dancing in the Wingsand Where the Wild Things Are.